Opinion & Analysis

Archive for October, 2009

Commodities, commodities, commodities

In 1 on October 16, 2009 at 4:08 am

OK, as mentioned before, there are 3 billion people in Asia, most of whom are aspiring to play the home version of the American Dream game show. And let’s face it: American society is largely about consumption. We like stuff―we buy it, we wear it, we eat it, we flaunt it, we sometimes even bedazzle it (yeah, Google that). So that’s a lot more consumption on the global level. Rogers notes that while consumption is expected to increase exponentially, not a lot of capacity has been added in the last few decades for a lot of commodities. Meaning, not a lot of new refineries have been built, and not a lot of new resources have been discovered or excavated for a variety of commodities.

In terms of oil, Rogers cites the fact that Saudi Arabia has not seen any new oil discoveries but has consistently said for the past two decades that its reserves are at 260 billion barrels (in which time it has sold 60 billion barrels). He also points out that farmers are a rapidly disappearing species. So to sum up―that’s a lot more people competing for diminishing resources (including the all-important energy and food). Basic supply and demand theory pretty much takes it from there.

“Commodities are the second-largest asset class in the world,” Rogers noted. And they are “the best anchor” for your portfolio, he adds.

Rogers says the typical life span of a commodities bull market is 18-20 years. We’re currently in year 11 right now. Yeah, it could end tomorrow, but that whole supply and demand imperative could also extend this bull beyond its typical time frame.

During the Q&A session, though, the conversation took a darker turn. One questioner asked if the increased competition for resources might lead to war, and Rogers allowed it was a possibility, though he hoped it would not come to that. He pointed out that when a rising power clashes with an established power, the result is usually war, and said that research consistently shows that resource shortages lead to war.

So, sure, commodities shortages might start World War III, but if you invest in the commodities themselves, you might at least be in decent financial shape when the shelling stops—and I’m not being flippant at all. War drives up the costs of commodities.

Jim Rogers on the Next 10 Years

In 1 on October 16, 2009 at 3:31 am

to Rogers, the 19th century was the era of the British Empire and the 20th century was the U.S.’ heyday. But the 21st century is China’s (though the rest of Asia is definitely going to get a boost too).

The reasons for this are many, but some points brought up by Rogers include the following:

  • The Chinese want to live like we do;
  • They are more eager to work;
  • They are better at saving;
  • There are 1.5 billion Chinese citizens (and 3 billion people in all of Asia), and we owe them money. They are, according to Rogers, “among the best capitalists in the world.”

There will be some setbacks, of course, Rogers says, but these are opportunities. “If you see setbacks in China, you should pick up the phone and get more involved,” he advised, before adding his favorite refrain, “The best advice of any kind that I can give you is to teach your children and grandchildren Chinese.”

Gawker’s crowd-sourced Goldman Sachs witchhunt

In 1 on October 16, 2009 at 12:58 am

It is a real pity that Gawker is now using the interweb to get people to spy on clients, friends, and ex’s.

Are you Facebook friends with a Goldmanite who just posted photos of his lavish bachelor party? Post them to our fancy new tag page, #GoldmanProject, or e-mail them to us. Are you a realtor who just sold a $4 million duplex a Goldman banker? Is your ex-boyfriend Goldman banker planning a year-end trip to Cabo to blow his bonus wad? Shoot us an e-mail. Likewise, if you catch any references to Goldman employees living large in the media, post them to #GoldmanProject to keep a running clipfile

This is definitely overstepping the boundaries and the resources of gawker should be focused on technological innovators who will help us grow out of this mess.

What is a life settlement securitization?

In 1, Fixed Income, Investing, Risk on October 15, 2009 at 1:36 am

More than you wanted to know about death bonds.

So we were asked to do some research on life settlement securitisations or death bonds and found this article from S&P.

What is a life settlement securitization?

Life settlements, sometimes referred to as senior or elder settlements, involve the purchase of life insurance policies from individuals, typically age 65 and older, who have various ailments or suffer from a particular disease and whose projected life expectancy is typically between two and 10 years. An investor trust buys the policies and assumes the responsibility to pay the policy premiums when due and the right to receive the policy benefit when the covered individual dies. The insurance policies are pooled and then repackaged as bonds and marketed to investors. The benefits of the policies go toward paying principal and interest on the bonds. (Life settlements differ from viatical settlements, which are policies purchased from individuals with terminal illnesses; though viatical settlements were once securitized.)

What are Standard & Poor’s concerns about life settlement securitizations?

  • Standard & Poor’s first concern is with the actuarial assumptions underlying a transaction. In our view, the small number of lives, usually only a few hundred (but typically around 100), included in a transaction is not sufficient to assure statistical credibility.
  • Our second concern relates to insurable interest, which can be generally defined as the interest the beneficiary of a life insurance policy has in the covered individual being alive, because the death of that individual would cause the beneficiary a loss, financial or otherwise.
  • A third concern is the accuracy of independent medical reviews that originators may use in these securitizations. Because no physical is required, only a review of the insured’s medical file is undertaken, there is a greater potential for underwriting errors. This, combined with the limited number of policies in the securitized pool, can have dramatic effects on cash flows.
  • One final issue is the timing of the cash flows. Upon the death of a policyholder, there is a statutory period for payment from the life insurance company, while the notes have predetermined payment dates. This could create a cash flow mismatch resulting in a missed payment and an event of default.
  • A fourth concern is that most life settlement originators that buy these policies have either limited or no track record. They often buy the pools using leverage, and after securitizing the pools retain a small residual equity position in the transaction. They’re paid a commission, but the risk they retain is minimal. Consequently, the bondholders are assuming the lion’s share of the risk, and the originators are in a position to focus more on their growth than on potential underwriting problems.

Source: http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2009/10/14/77781/more-than-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-death-bonds/

What Hedge Funds Are Buying and Selling Now

In 1 on October 15, 2009 at 1:00 am

A report from Bank of America Merrill Lynch:

Many funds are buying S&P and NDX future and have covered shorts in the Russell 2000. They note that funds are now crowded in gold trade while some also bought platinum.  Other moves include selling crude oil and reducing longs in heating oil. Meanwhile, on the forex markets, hedge funds are steadily pressing their short on the US dollar dn the market seems to have held onto a crowded long Japanese Yen position.

The report notes very deep short term positions in the 10 year and 30 year treasuries. They have also apparently reduced some of their long 2 Year Treasury positions. These latest moves seem to indicate that hedge funds as a whole are scaling back a bit from the curve steepener trade.
BofA Merrill Lynch Hedge Fund Monitor Oct 2009